what does it mean when your mind is blank

[arifhasan2]

The climate policy of the 21st century will indeed be a struggle. Gathered around Jean Tirol, 2014 Nobel Prize winner, the economists of the Toulouse School of Economics (TSE) had been doubtful for months as to the outcome of the Paris conference and the content of the agreement likely to result. “A summit for nothing! “ Wrote Emmanuel Thibault and Frédéric Cher bonnier recently. No, Paris will not have been a summit for nothing. For the economists who signed the appeal launched by TSE and the Chair of Climate Economics at Paris Dauphine University, the dominant solution should have been that of a universal carbon price and a transcontinental market for carbon permits.

The Paris agreement, adopted by consensus on December 12, turns its back on their recommendations. The signature of the text still fresh, Jean Tirol writes , in an implicit reminder of the failure of the Copenhagen conference in 2009: “We are hardly more advanced than six years ago”. Quality analyzes without advertising, every day in your emails. The test phone number list
= of geopolitics The argumentation of the TSE economists, of which only a few salient features will be retained here , is as follows. Firstly, it dismisses policies and measures, i.e. state action through regulations and standards (which may relate to emissions, products or processes): "Its application in countries with central planning has shown its limits. The standard is also “very costly to apply”.



The approach based on economic incentives, ie by resorting to taxation or permit markets (which are their preference), is favored, especially since “market and democracy often go hand in hand”. The preferred scheme is none other than the one already envisaged in the period between the Kyoto protocol (1997) and the failure of Copenhagen (2009). It is a triptych: global emission ceiling + sharing of emission rights between nations + international quota market. The keystone of this system would have been an “independent body” for the regulation of the permit market, which generates the price of carbon.